Discuss Star Trek: The Motion Picture

Some fan in Trek magazine back in I think the early 80's wrote that she did not understand why McCoy was brought to the Enterprise. The doctor already there (Nurse Christine Chapel now an MD) was capable of doing all the medical work. But Trek magazine responded it was what Kirk said to McCoy when he came aboard. That he (Kirk) needed him. Not that the ship but that Kirk did. In other words he needed Bones standing by his side during the V'Ger mission.

8 replies (on page 1 of 1)

Jump to last post

Thanks for clarifying something that anyone paying attention to the movie already knew.

The poster who wrote to Trek magazine did not understand. Some would have and actually misunderstood what Kirk meant.

Even though Dr Chapel was capable to handle and treat the medical needs of the Enterprise crew, it's good to have several doctors onboard in case of a crisis with multiple wounded in need of urgent care

@VobIdem said:

Even though Dr Chapel was capable to handle and treat the medical needs of the Enterprise crew, it's good to have several doctors onboard in case of a crisis with multiple wounded in need of urgent care

They have assistants and sophisticated computers anyway. Drs are probably rare with so much more to learn. Another doctor not very necessary. Just one. Possible some Fed ships do not have a doctor just medical assistants well trained. So giving two doctors to a ship is not a practice really. It was pointed out that McCoy did do a bit of medical work. The poster seemingly liked McCoy a whole lot but she did not understand why it was necessary to bring him back.

PS It is safer to have only one doctor on ship so if it is destroyed the Federation is only out one rare physician. McCoy did not seem much to be regular Federation any longer by the time of the movie. So Kirk got a rather private practice MD to come aboard.

Trek magazine used to answer a lot of plot holes. If Kirk was never was there why was Edith Keeper killed in the traffic accident originally -- one fan wondered.Trek answered this way. Kirk having little if any movie knowledge and Edith was probably on her way to the movies by herself.

How could Edith Keeler being seeing a Clark Gable movie when he was just a bit player in films that very year-- another fan wanted to know. Trek replied Spock said Edith had gifted insight. She guessed Gable would go far in his then modest career.

In "A taste of Armegeddon" how did Scotty beam down that important Fed commissioner(?) when the ship's shields were covering the whole vessel -- another fan wanted to know. Trek replied that as the ship was never once actually under attack-- just threatened to be--I think they said Scotty cut a sort of a hole in some of the shield and shot him down to the planet.

This Trek magazine has an endless amount of plot holes to explain nowadays

You said it Vob. They also gave an explanation for no shuttlecraft in 'Enemy Within" but ironically I forget what it exactly it was (it was not that the writers hadn't invented it yet yet!).

Here is another. Why did Janice Lester record in the ship's log she took over Kirk's body? They said she was mentally ill.

Can't find a movie or TV show? Login to create it.

Global

s focus the search bar
p open profile menu
esc close an open window
? open keyboard shortcut window

On media pages

b go back (or to parent when applicable)
e go to edit page

On TV season pages

(right arrow) go to next season
(left arrow) go to previous season

On TV episode pages

(right arrow) go to next episode
(left arrow) go to previous episode

On all image pages

a open add image window

On all edit pages

t open translation selector
ctrl+ s submit form

On discussion pages

n create new discussion
w toggle watching status
p toggle public/private
c toggle close/open
a open activity
r reply to discussion
l go to last reply
ctrl+ enter submit your message
(right arrow) next page
(left arrow) previous page

Settings

Want to rate or add this item to a list?

Login