Discuss King Arthur: Legend of the Sword

I dunno, Jude Law and Charlie Hunnam look too modern for the time period. And not sure Guy Ritchie's style - fast moving camera work, fast cuts - suits this sort of period setting. But on the plus side... that is one huge elephant! grinning

5 replies (on page 1 of 1)

Jump to last post

Yeah, I'm surprised Arthur doesn't access his smart phone just to check his Twitter account. wink

Did you think the same about the Sherlock movies?

@bratface said:

Did you think the same about the Sherlock movies?

I going to presume that by "Sherlock movies" you're referring to the BBC episodes featuring Cumberbatch and Freeman and not the TV show Elementary featuring Liu and Miller. I say this because while I can't speak for the others in the conversation, Sherlock (imo) can be played independently of time period. Sherlock is about a character and a process. The original books were written during the turn of the century, so naturally most adaptations have been period pieces. But if you strip it to its essential elements, it's about a super-smart detective with uncanny powers of observation and disguise solving complex crimes. That's it. You can set it in the future and the characters would still be the same.

Arthur, on the other hand, is about a King, a magic sword, his kingdom, the knights who helped conquer it, and the intrigues that led to his downfall. You can certainly adapt the Arthurian legend to modern times, but you'd necessarily need to lose the swords and horses because they'd be anathema to the modern world. However, I can see why some would criticize the disjointed mix of modern hair styles, costumes, and quick-cut filming techniques with a "period" picture such as this because of the incongruity it creates. Even the edits for modern audiences might work if everything else was faithful. (See Braveheart for ways this can be done.) But when you muddle it and mix them together, it's distracting. Either set it in the modern period and dispense with the chainmail, swords, and horses, or stop trying to make your actors look like modern GQ models and give it its proper period look.

BTW, I'm no fan of Guy Ritchie. He's much too glossy and slick for my tastes, anyway.

Alien, I was referring to Ritchie's 'Sherlock' movies. Why would I refer to the BBC's version (which sucks by the way) of Sherlock in a thread about Guy Ritchie's 'King Arthur' movie?

Hunnam looks like he just came off the set from an episode of Sons of Anarchy. His hair style is totally contemporary.

Can't find a movie or TV show? Login to create it.

Global

s focus the search bar
p open profile menu
esc close an open window
? open keyboard shortcut window

On media pages

b go back (or to parent when applicable)
e go to edit page

On TV season pages

(right arrow) go to next season
(left arrow) go to previous season

On TV episode pages

(right arrow) go to next episode
(left arrow) go to previous episode

On all image pages

a open add image window

On all edit pages

t open translation selector
ctrl+ s submit form

On discussion pages

n create new discussion
w toggle watching status
p toggle public/private
c toggle close/open
a open activity
r reply to discussion
l go to last reply
ctrl+ enter submit your message
(right arrow) next page
(left arrow) previous page

Settings

Want to rate or add this item to a list?

Login