Discuss The Belko Experiment

This movie totally kept me guessing until the very end. The people I thought would die didn't. I like how the writer made the rules, up the ante and then modified them. I liked guessing which people would die and how it would happen. I liked seeing the characters react to their predicament.

7 replies (on page 1 of 1)

Jump to last post

I liked it and agree it needs a sequel.

Not sure where they'd go with a sequel, I like the ending showing MORE experiments going on simultanously...I like the endings that make your mind imagine away without going into full details. This is good enough as is (stand alone flick), but wouldn't be angry over a sequel either.

The ending actually showed that there was one survivor from each of the many MORE experiments going on simultaneously. All /any one of those survivors is a place to go with a sequel. Unnecessary sequels are made from movies with a lesser premise all the time.

I enjoyed everything except the way it ended when the purpose of the experiment was finally revealed. I thought the ending jumped the shark. I don't think the movie deserves a sequel either. I'm getting very tired of sequels anyway.

It was pretty intense. Greg Mclean's best since Wolf Creek. But then that's not really saying much.

@ScorpionQ2 said:

The ending actually showed that there was one survivor from each of the many MORE experiments going on simultaneously. All /any one of those survivors is a place to go with a sequel. Unnecessary sequels are made from movies with a lesser premise all the time.

I liked it well enough for what it was, but I don't see a need for a sequel. What more can they do or say that wasn't already done and said? It would be a money-grab retread like Human Centipede 2 or Beyond the Poseidon Adventure. The original story was self-contained (and extraordinarily derivative). That said, they clearly left it open for a sequel when the voice-over intoned "End of Phase 1. Prepare for Phase 2." I guess the lone survivor of each "experiment" will be pitted against one another. Been there, seen that.

@Dedoc1967 said:

I guess the lone survivor of each "experiment" will be pitted against one another. Been there, seen that.

That may apply to you- but realize everyone does not have the cup or the hat.

Like I previously stated- unnecessary sequels are made from movies with a lesser premise all the time.

Movies that don't need a sequel very often not only get a sequel, (and sometimes even the dreaded prequel ) but a part 3, 4, 5, 6 , and so on . So it's not about need, what it boils down to is there some producer somewhere who will take on the task.

If one is made from The Belco Experiment, then it's simple - anyone who doesn't want to see it doesn't have to.

Can't find a movie or TV show? Login to create it.

Global

s focus the search bar
p open profile menu
esc close an open window
? open keyboard shortcut window

On media pages

b go back (or to parent when applicable)
e go to edit page

On TV season pages

(right arrow) go to next season
(left arrow) go to previous season

On TV episode pages

(right arrow) go to next episode
(left arrow) go to previous episode

On all image pages

a open add image window

On all edit pages

t open translation selector
ctrl+ s submit form

On discussion pages

n create new discussion
w toggle watching status
p toggle public/private
c toggle close/open
a open activity
r reply to discussion
l go to last reply
ctrl+ enter submit your message
(right arrow) next page
(left arrow) previous page

Settings

Want to rate or add this item to a list?

Login