Granted this is the UK and it’s also decades before the Sullivan brothers tragedy, but it seems odd they would put a sibling from another unit in extreme danger in order to save the brother’s battle group. Is there a historical precedent for this?
Negalite rasti filmo ar TV laidos? Prisijunkite, kad sukurtumėte.
Norite įvertinti ar įtraukti šį elementą į sąrašą?
Nesate narys?
Atsakė znexyish
2020 vasario 16, 2:32 PM
Perhaps an unintentional precedent. It's just a cheap emotional stunt and sets up another one in the middle and both relate to the one at the end.
Atsakė MongoLloyd
2020 vasario 16, 11:14 PM
Probably made the most sense to send a soldier who had an emotional motivation to succeed seeing as how it was such a sh!t show. Any other soldier might have holed up somewhere and claimed he came under fire and couldn't reach his goal.
Here's a little trivia about the Sullivan brothers: the WW2 film, "Proud" was partially filmed on the SS Sullivan which is sitting in the naval park in Buffalo, NY.
Atsakė OddRob
2020 vasario 17, 11:25 PM
Emotional motivation. They knew the younger brother would do anything to try and save the older.