Season 1 was the best season all the following seasons are just too weird and all over the place! Do you agree?
The first season really compelled me. It really made me feel like they are living in THE END OF TIMES or an apocalypse, but from season 2 on it just goes all over the place. Its like the writers just want to just keep adding the more weirder the better story lines that don't really go anywhere. I really liked Kevin's daughter and her friend trying to be teens during these weird end times in season 1, it actually seemed realistic.
But season 2 on seems like a total different show. Where you don't seem to care as much since it seems so extremely weird. I mean whats the purpose of having cast members from Perfect Strangers through out the show pop in. Is the writer or producer a big fan of the show Perfect Strangers? Did I totally miss the point of all that?
All in all, still enjoy the show, but I'd wish it was a bit more realistic like the first season. Now that Kevin can't be killed its like well why even care whenever he's in a tight spot, he can't be killed right?
Can't find a movie or TV show? Login to create it.
Want to rate or add this item to a list?
Not a member?
Reply by MrCharmingMan
on June 7, 2017 at 11:06 AM
Yes exactly! I mean as bad as LOST was at least they pretty much explained all the weird crap and why it was happening because they are all DEAD and are waiting to see if they get to go to heaven or hell. LOST went into too many unnecessary flash forwards ands flash sideways that never actually happened within the actual lineal timeline of LOST, but you can at least understand that the network wanted the writers to write a bunch of filler episodes to sell more add time to, but HBO has no reason to do that since they don't rely on ads like networks do.
Yeah Id actually rather have Kevin turn out to be Jesus or some kind of God or savior instead of just looking for an old ass Nora with bad hair and wrinkled face to talk for the last 30minutes of the episode. Seeing how HBO ended Sopranos shoot the whole final seasons of Sopranos was awful and the ending was one of the biggest WTF of all television history we should of known better than to think they would have ended Leftovers in any decent way as well.
Reply by ScorpionQ2
on June 7, 2017 at 11:52 AM
@MrCharmingMan said:
DEAD @ $50
EXACTLY! But what was the point of ALL the points they depicted/brought up throughout the whole series?
For closure so I can move on to the next mind phuck, here is what I made of the series finale:
I think Nora had learned to accept her sins (constantly screwing over Kevin and thinking her loss was always greater than those of others) of the past ("sins of people's past"-what the beads the goat was wearing represented and she put them on thus "owning her sins") I'm just glad it ended with Kevin alive...and happy.
The birds returning- her knowing peace from the acceptance of her sins. Whoopee. It was always all about Nora- just like she had always acted like it was.
: yawn: No big reveal/questions answered/firework ending. Just ...The End...and then... one last was flipped.
Reply by ScorpionQ2
on June 7, 2017 at 12:11 PM
@MrCharmingMansaid:
From past experiences, I predicted they wouldn't answer half of the questions brought up and end with even more unanswered new ones. That theme song Let The Mystery Be actually told us up front what the deal was .
Reply by ScorpionQ2
on June 7, 2017 at 2:52 PM
@Invidia said:
After that ending, the whole series was a lie.
I will not watch <--- and why does the angry emoji look Asian?
I wanted to know what happened in the place where they all stayed.
And why was Nora soo much-wayy much more older looking than Kevin? Did the machine age her? Was the boat ride years long? How many years had actually passed when Kevin finally found her? Why did old Laurie have a young baby that looked nothing like John?
Kevin can't die but yet has a heart attack? Just who/what was Kevin?
And they were acting horribly/getting on her nerves when they were shown at the (breakfast?) table.
And how come we never hear of anyone else ever RETURNING ? Did not someone say-" You can't come back." ?
It wasn't actually shown- Nora caught the guy sneaking out and questions the nun about it- like it's even her business.
oh well, just another show I am sure I will never re watch.
Reply by ScorpionQ2
on June 8, 2017 at 10:52 AM
@Invidia said:
Well, that explains that.
Well, it is a very good one.
Exactly this (and a lot more I won't dwell on anymore) why that ending was just SO phucked up.
Reply by Crisstti
on June 13, 2017 at 1:55 AM
Because she’s not remembering how horrible they were behaving. She’s remembering how horrible SHE was behaving, by being annoyed at them and caring more about her potential job than about them.
Of course her being annoyed was really nothing out of the ordinary and completely irrelevant, IF they hadn’t suddenly disappeared forever right after. My point being, she fells GUILTY. That is her main emotion about it all, and why she’s so f*cked up. She doesn’t feel sorry for herself anywhere near as much as she feels guilty.
Reply by Crisstti
on June 13, 2017 at 10:52 PM
There is literally nothing to indicate that her husband would somehow done something to encourage that. At all.
The children were demanding food, but in a playful way. They were just being children. And children can be annoying sometimes. There was nothing out of the ordinary there.
And this really is not different from any situation where a loved one suddenly does. It leaves everything unresolved. It makes every little time where you were not loving enough seem like a huge sin that you can’t stop thinking about. She can’t forget that the last time she saw them, talked to them, interacted with them, was to scream at them. It doesn’t matter if it was justified or not. Ultimately her potential job and her cell phone didn’t matter compared to how her children mattered.
She has a “hissy fit”? she’s understandably upset that her identity is being stolen.
So… you’re just listing all the reasons why you don’t like Nora.
She had her whole family disappear from one moment to the next. She’ is NOT mentally ok, no one would be. I’d say she acts pretty well all considered.
Maybe. Though I didn’t detect any sarcasm.
Reply by Crisstti
on July 29, 2017 at 1:36 PM
Man, you don't know much about kids if you think they were so horrible children for screaming they wanted breakfast. And yes, they were being playful, but didn't notice her mom wasn't in the mood for it... because they were kids.
BTW, the more I think about it the more I'm sure the story Nora told Kevin was in no way true.
Reply by MrCharmingMan
on July 30, 2017 at 2:38 AM
WOW I almost forgot how crappy this ending was and almost forgot I put so much trust and hope into this show and finale until I checked my email and got an alert and brought me back here LOL.
Reply by Crisstti
on August 31, 2017 at 2:35 PM
The ending was really pretty strange, as was the whole season imo. The whole theme was changed and I'm not sure why. nevertheless, I still think it was good, and I definitely think she was lying at the end, and that that's what we were supossed to get from that.
Sure, she was a "no bs" woman - as shown by her hunging the picture of the dead tower guy for everyone to see and take them thus out of their fantasy - but she actually struggled between that and the hope she WANTED to have. She wanted to believe things were better than they seemed, she wanted to believe in the "better story", we can even take this as her wanting to have faith, in a religious sense. We can see this, for example, in her going to the magic hugging guy (forgot his name) in season one (and she actually WAS better after that, even if only for the power of self suggestion). We can also see it in her wanting then to go into the machine in season three. This despite every logical part of her being telling her that it was fake, a sham.
It is the way this season makes sense, and it's actually an extremely interesting idea and theme. It was just a bit strangely developed, especially since it changed so much from the previous seasons.
Reply by Crisstti
on September 5, 2017 at 7:05 PM
Probably. But the important thing is, it was a scam.
Possibly. Or any similar scenario.
Guess that because he wanted to believe. Or he didn’t want to destroy HER faith at least.
Who knows. They could simply be some kind of half dying dreams. Or they could be some kind of real travel. That the black guy from the second season (John’s father?) killed himself to go there too and help him would seem to indicate they happened on some level… but I’m not sure the very writers have an answer there.
I remember someone posted an excellent analysis of that sequence (sp?) on the old IMDb forums, but I can’t remember it…
I don’t know, I think it addresses them fairly well.
John indeed, had no faith, and then he had faith. He was clearly better in the second “state”, so to speak.
I’d say with Meg it was the other way around. She had faith – in that things somehow made sense, in that finding out what her mom wanted to tell her would give the situation meaning – but what she got from Isaac was the opposite. Things were random and meaningless. And that’s what the GR are kind of about, aren’t they?.
I’m thinking it’s the same with Eve.
Maybe the actress couldn’t commit to the season.
The effect Wayne had on her was due to her own faith in that it would work imo. He may well have thought he WAS the real deal.
Unfortunately I haven’t seen either the new Twin Peaks nor Fargo (love Nora’s actress though, so another reason to give it a look). I actually still haven’t finished the original Twin Peaks. LOVED it for a while but man, does it get bad there in a moment. It supposedly gets better again towards the end, but I haven’t been able to get through the bad episodes yet. Don’t know if I could pick between the original twin peaks and this one though.
Which one do you like better?